I'm not directly referring to you, but I will say that how people conduct themselves says everything about them.
What about Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix,
Linus Torvalds (<--- click this!), Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, etc..
They accomplished nothing.
Well everybody accomplishes something. Whether it's good or bad is another story.
The people on his list were among the best at what they did. You're not even a very accomplished troll, maybe flashing your balls would help....
Wait a second... you think "Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, and Mike Tyson" were the best at what they did? On what grounds are you making that comment? Drug addiction or thuggery?
I think I've already identified your problem.
[...]
The reason you don't like what I'm saying is because you know that I view you as "not the right type of person", and you'd be correct about that assumption. Imo, anyone who makes comments about "crowdsourcing a Jenna Jameson android"...
In your rigid world, the only art would be Frank Sinatra. We would all use anti-bacterial soap all the time (and be infected with superbugs). And Linus Torvalds doesn't even deserve recognition in your response. Each of those mentioned above were the best at new genre, e.g. Mike Tyson mastered the combination of power, speed, and efficiency at the heavyweight division and his short arms had a lot to do with it (not only due to the power+speed, but also that he only had to bob his head efficiently to slip punches so he cold stay in close). You don't even appreciate the finer details of analysis and diversity. In short, you appear to be a blind simpleton with an oversized Trump ego.
Btw, apparently bipolar people are statistically more creative.
Also I don't know if you noticed but promiscuous sex is necessary for the evolutionary (Anti-fragile, resilient) reproduction of the human race. And
women practice hypergamy and men practice promiscuity, because it is an evolutionary strategy. Religion is apparently another evolutionary strategy,
perhaps to countervail the prior instincts, so as to
prevent defection from society. This is science. If you don't like it, nature doesn't care. Nature is more complex and diverse than (and ignores/trashes daily) your simpleton rigidness.
Can you invalidate any of Shelby's criticisms of synereo? If not, why are you wasting everyone's time? Besides the obvious of having a bag of synereo that your emotionally bound to defend until it reaches some set price goal that you think will make you a success.
All of Shelby's criticisms of Synereo are his personal opinions. There's nothing to invalidate.
No I explained the marketing science for why a main aspect of their stated feature set has no use case.
generalizethis, obviously do what you want, but I think it is sufficient to let him have the last post on this matter. For me, our elucidation of this thread is already clear and there is nothing he can say that will change that, other than to apologize.