Quote from: shefchenko17 on April 08, 2016, 11:40:56 AM

hahahahah you talk much, but say nothing. "as long as there is a chance that a participant may not be fully-informed about how it functions" ...I've a question for you are you fully informed? Is there anyway that could be fully informed? The man has explained that it is a ponzi, explained how ponzis work, explained that he would pay the old ones by the new ones' money...What else do you need to be explained? And please don't answer like before "you proved that ... some shit" "you fail by you own bla bla.." EXPLAAAAAAAAAIN us what else do you need?

shefchenko17 have you not yet understood that here it is worthless to explain something...
I have tryied to explain my systems 100 times and it was worthless.
I tried to explain that my NO-ponzi is not a ponzi...
here it is tried to explain that this ponzi is a ponzi...
Same story...(lol)

Quote from: Honestbit on April 08, 2016, 11:50:22 AM

Quote from: cryptodevil on April 08, 2016, 09:01:34 AM

Quote from: shefchenko17 on April 08, 2016, 08:26:04 AM

Interesting...could you explain exactly how is his scheme being dishonest?

Seriously? How many ways do I need to explain it?

Actually, no, I take that back shefchenko, thank you! You've just proved to me that even when somebody claims to be fully-informed about a ponzi scheme they *still* can fail to understand it properly.

Quote from: cryptodevil on April 08, 2016, 06:43:41 AM

The issue has always been that your scheme cannot be honest as long as there is a chance that a participant may not be fully-informed about how it functions.

Do you see how you fail at this? Your scheme can *never* be 'honest' as long as random internet strangers can be incited to participate.

As long as there is a chance that the operator will knowingly take money from participants who might not properly understand the system then those who operate the scheme and those who willingly accept a share of the money from this inherently flawed process are doing so dishonestly when they claim it is an 'honest' ponzi.

If you cannot ensure 100% fully-informed participation, which you cannot as already proven, then you cannot claim your ponzi to be an honest system because it may contain funds from people who would otherwise not have sent them, had they actually fully understood what the scheme was.

I have a question for you: is the Earth round?

I can answer this question:
the Earth is round.
the earth is a round flat disk floating on water...
and the sun is turning arround the disk...
Fool people try to say us the the Earth is a big orange...
try to walk on a big orange...without falling out when you are under it...