Quote from: ruletheworld on April 10, 2016, 09:56:26 PM

Quote from: watuba on April 10, 2016, 09:33:57 PM

Quote from: mxxxxxx on April 10, 2016, 09:22:42 PM

Quote from: watuba on April 10, 2016, 09:16:28 PM

Quote from: sasha35625 on April 09, 2016, 02:03:30 PM

Quote from: jman887854 on April 09, 2016, 01:51:38 PM

Could someone please explain to me why the crowdsale needs to last almost 2 months?

We want to have main net after ICO ends. It has many advantages, one of them - no IOU situations.

Then why not just start the ICO later so it still only lasts 1 month? 2 months is super greedy from devs trying to raise a giant dev fund.

Noone knows atm how small or big ICO is gonna be, the same you can invest on the last day if you prefer to follow development, partnerships and other updates in meantime.

That's not addressing my point. A 2 month ICO will have more investment than a 1 month ICO, all other factors equal. 2 months is greedy of devs and potentially fleeces investors.

How will you determine a "fair" length of the ICO? I've seen people complain that an ICO was too short, and they didn't hear about it and therefore couldn't invest in the time-frame.

This happened at digix last week. Their ICO endet upon 12 hours due to reaching the goal. in my opinion 2 month is a good timeframe