@ MPOE-PR, sense BFL's CEO's parole/probation officer knows about his activities from multiple sources, how come his parole officer hasn't violated his parole and sent him back to jail? Could it be because there is no violation of parole? MPOE-PR simple logic doesn't seam to be your strong suit, right?
If you call that sad display logic, simple or otherwise, I'll just call you an idiot and we can part ways.
Masterfull attempt at dealing with tough questions!
Just call them idiots and turn around.
Brilliant and very convincing.
Bravo, I say, Bravo!
Are you serious?!
It's only a violation if he didn't contact his probation officer about this, and no one has proven that he hasn't contacted his probation officer about this.
Except the onus is on him to prove he has in fact contacted his PO and he has in fact obtained (written) permission. Not on "anybody" to show that he "hasn't". Seriously, logic. Let's all use it.
Ok... you do know that I asked for proof right? What you've provided is you restating the same statements you've already made.
A little more complicated than that: you demand proof for things that are widely known and amply documented. If the OP presents you that proof you claim they "repeat the same information in the vain hope that if you say it enough times it might be believable". If the OP doesn't bother with your retarded ass you claim they "slink off in silence". It's right there in this latest installment of nonsense, he's pretty much saying it outright.
You're wasting your time posting that sort of nonsense, it won't buy you anything. The idiot that was correcting my "grammer" was doing a much better job.
Proof requires an outside authority qualified to speak on the matter.
In BTC, I'm the authority. Who are you?