Quote from: MasterMined710 on April 14, 2016, 06:40:15 AM

Quote from: smooth on April 14, 2016, 06:05:30 AM

Quote from: MasterMined710 on April 14, 2016, 05:55:42 AM

i think it's fair to call DASH a instamine but to be completely accurate it would be a "accidental instamine".

That is was "accidental" is unproven (and by many, disbelieved), so you are scamming investors (and just being flat out dishonest) when you claim that is "completely accurate" and state the same as a fact.

As for the so-called "cripplemine" I don't even know what you mean by that made up term, nor particularly care. The nature of this thread is quite clear.

you're playing word games again smooth.
i could just as easily say...That it was "not accidental" is unproven.

"Proven" is subjective, and I did not use that word above. When you "prove" something in court, for example, it is the opinion of a judge or jury that decides, based on some collection of evidence and a standard of proof.

However, if you were to say that one can not state "not accidental" as a "completely accurate" fact any more than one can state it was "accidental" as a "completely accurate" fact, I'd generally agree.

Quote

it was not an intentional instamine in the sense that it was not "sold as" a instamine stlye distribution coin but that it accidentally happened and was fixed.

No.

Intentional vs. accidental is not directly observable. Again, it is, at best, your opinion that it "accidentally happened".

Perhaps what you are trying to say is that it wasn't explicitly advertised as an instamine. Which of course is part of the problem.

Quote

DASH fits TBCM's first definition of a (accidental) instamine.

Quote from: TBCM on December 08, 2013, 11:21:57 PM

When a coin is born, if the initial difficulty to get a block is too low, you can get a ton of coins (blocks) really fast if you get in early. The coin is instantly mined.

It is somewhat close, except that unlike some instamines (generally smaller ones, such as Litecoin), Dash's instamine produced a huge number of coins not only from the difficulty adjustment, but also from the block rewards being too high, relative to what was advertised (and also relative to the overall supply).

BTW, TBCM didn't say anything about accidental. It would fit his definition equally well if the initial difficulty were deliberately set too low. Not that I'm holding up TBCM as an authority on the definition of instamine. I just quoted that for the date, since you claimed that the term instamine was created or popularized by Monero supporters which is flatly ridiculous when it was widely discussed months before Monero existed.

Of course flatly ridiculous claims coming from you is not surprising at all. We all know why we are here:

Quote from: cryptohunter on April 13, 2016, 01:23:58 AM

i would not trust one word mastermined710 says.

I was on the xcoin(dash) captive instamine launch. I was there in real time and watched it unfold.

He now tries to deny things that happened actually happened on that launch. He is not to be trusted.

Although, this is not a dash/xcoin/dark thread I will not go into it here. I will only say if you want examples of his lies then please contact me for details.

This person is either a total scammer or likes to try and destroy the truth with nuances that are laughable. His tactic is to say he is telling the truth so that the real truth that is a correct and proper picture is distorted and cast in doubt.

He is making this thread only to divert from the dash scam thread.

He is a scam protector and pumper.