Quote from: SynereoCommunity on April 14, 2016, 02:29:54 PM

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on April 14, 2016, 07:44:07 AM

Quote from: SynereoCommunity on April 14, 2016, 03:52:53 AM

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on April 13, 2016, 10:10:18 PM

Sorry I have no time to dig for it. If you click through to all my posts on Synereo in about 4 threads total, you should find it in an exchange between Elokane and myself.

Ah, well hearing about some of the advancements since the white paper was written from the CEO is a good place.

Just hard to see where you came to your views.

As far as such speculation goes, only time will tell.

I wrote the specification is not public. The CEO admitted it. What is hard to understand. Roll Eyes

My comment on your views had nothing to do with your statement about hearing news from Elokane. It was regarding your unverified claims and assertions elsewhere. There's room for differing opinions, of course.

However, while we're on that line, the info that you speak of was and is public; not being in the white paper does not change that. Nor is Elokane the 'lead developer'.

Small changes, but important as to the potential for misinterpreting what you've said.

I stated we don't even know how the attention model will work because there are significant changes which are not holistically specified in a holistic document. That is a fact. Go refer to the discussion between Elokane and myself for the details. For example, it revolved around my observation that they would need to structure rep different for different #hashtags, which is no where in the whitepaper.

Elokane is the according to a Hangout I watched, credited by Greg as having the original idea and code, and Greg developed math to model and augment/formalize Elokane's initial work.

I have no idea who is the leader now, or if there is even one leader.