Have I not explained my stance now?
Yes, you admit you are against Synereo because you do not understand it.
Because they have only provided
hand-waving technobabble and no specification that could be peer reviewed by anyone here.
The rest of your post was a combination of disingenuous drivel and more hype to pump some technobabble. Good luck.
Again you are speaking nonsense. There is ample material for review and comment at
http://blog.synereo.com/ and the basic information at
http://www.synereo.com/learn-more/, in the weekly hangouts and on the slack.
While I agree completely that more formal up do date publications would be nice, there are some pretty awesome innovations weekly and no paper submitted for publication would be out of date before it came out. Greg's academic credentials are beyond question and there is more formal definition behind synereo than 99% of the decentralized applications out there. Greg has done some recent papers
http://www.mathpubs.com/author/Lucius+Gregory+Meredith have much more meat than the "hand waving" you characterize. I consider Greg's time better spent on developing Synereo which is why the community is taking on expressing Greg's abstract mathematics in terms you might understand.