Quote from: Moloch on April 15, 2016, 11:05:55 PM

Quote from: lasersgopew on April 15, 2016, 08:50:17 PM

Quote from: Moloch on April 15, 2016, 08:31:13 PM

Quote from: lasersgopew on April 15, 2016, 08:26:28 PM

Quote from: Moloch on April 15, 2016, 07:54:40 PM

Quote from: lasersgopew on April 15, 2016, 07:37:57 PM

Quote from: Moloch on April 15, 2016, 07:06:38 PM

Quote from: lasersgopew on April 15, 2016, 06:38:32 PM

Quote from: Moloch on April 15, 2016, 04:38:56 PM

Quote from the Don

http://cdn.skim.gs/images/ynriqyo7ejv3ikxuqncx/DonaldTrump_26

I don't see how anyone could consider this racist (bazinga)

Doesn't hold a candle to the racist quotes attributed to Sanders.

http://i.imgur.com/0OHTjwC.jpg

Check your facts... that is a quote by Margaret Sanger, not Bernie Sanders... stop with the slander

I know it's a quote by Margaret Sanger, racist neoliberal demigod and founder of Planned Parenthood -- I just thought we were just making shit up, since you posted that blatantly false Trump quote?

It's not false... it's printed in a book written in 1991... do you need a link, or can you google the fucking quote?

It's written in a book, so that makes it true? Interesting logic. I guess Abraham Lincoln really was a vampire hunter after all.

For your information, the book was "Trumped!: The Inside Story of the Real Donald Trump-His Cunning Rise and Spectacular Fall", and it was written by a former Trump employee, "John R. O'Donnell", who had previously been fired by Trump from his job as the president of Trump Plaza Hotel & Casino, for his poor performance.

The full quote, as alleged by the disgruntled former employee:

"I have black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day. Those are the kind of people I want counting my money. Nobody else. Besides that, I've got to tell you something else. I think that the guy is lazy. And it's probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It's not anything they can control... Don't you agree?"

Let us assume for a moment that this is a legitimate quotation and that it accurately reflects his understanding of the situation -- what about it is wrong? Is it wrong because it's factually incorrect, or is it wrong because it hurts your fee-fees? Would such a sentiment, objectively an accurate portrayal of reality -- impair his ability to lead and make effective decisions? No? If on the other hand, his capacity for objective thought were so diminished as to render him incapable of recognizing the truth in that situation -- instead leading him to supplant objectivity with a narrative based solely on emotion and social expectation -- would he then be of diminished capacity as a leader? Objectively, yes.

How does the full quote make it better? It actually makes it worse...

He basically says he hates black people... "I have black guys counting my money... I hate it!"

That's fucking racist

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/1f/df/ef/1fdfef6f39a37ff2fff1ef16a231ca8e.jpg

Is your reading comprehension really that poor, or are you, as the British would say, "taking the piss"?

Anyway, since you don't like constructive arguments or complex abstract thought, here's another lie about Bernie Sanders:

http://i.imgur.com/xJEJMQN.jpg

Is all you have ad-hominem attacks?

1) Donald Trump is known for suing for slander... he's done it dozens of times

B) Donald Trump did not sue for slander in this particular case

One could assume that when he doesn't sue for slander, it's because it is true (slander has to be false)

Once again, you insist on only arguing within this false paradigm in which "BUT HES A RAYSIS!!" is a legitimate refutation, it isn't. This Hegelian dialectic you're gravitating towards is but a trap for fools, and is a calling card for the sort of neoliberal protoserfs that you'd expect to be following a self-professed Communist such as Sanders. You don't address the actual substance of any of my arguments because you can't formulate a cogent response; instead, you redirect the basis of the argument back to the original subjective crux of whether or not Trump is a racist, with the implication being that this would somehow disqualify him. Until you can see past this fundamental flaw in your reasoning, there isn't much point in me trying to provide another legitimate counterargument. It's analogous to arguing with child who responds to every riposte with "because!" -- ultimately, the child becomes the lesser of fools as the debate progresses.

It reminds me of something Bernie once said,

http://i.imgur.com/sKJdz2W.jpg