That was quite an entertaining read actually.
By the way - math may be reliable. The technology that implements it may not be.
Also, did you just give up on trying to prove that there isn't a trustless way to verify dash's masternode distribution?
Masternodes are not distributed amongst people. There is no association between a masternode and a person any more than there is with Bitconi nodes. A person may hold a private key to a blockchain address which a masternode checks (for collateral) in order to make sure it should be running.
There is some association as far as spending a proportion of the blockchain reward though - in terms of a collateral holder being able to vote.
Masternodes are owned by people, which means the distribution of power, fees, or whatever else you morons layer on them can't be distributed in a trustlessly decentralized way, but nice attempt to muddy the waters using the same semantics that separate a premine from an instamine. So you are now admitting that ownership isn't decentralized, but you can technically claim that the masternodes are? Or am I misreading your shillspeak? I don't have trouble reading Sylvia Plath or Nietzsche, but half-truths dressed up as technical jargon are a little under my pay-grade, so maybe you could just say it like a normal person and not one trying to hide something.