Quote from: Carlton Banks on April 19, 2016, 05:55:46 PM

Quote from: adamstgBit on April 19, 2016, 05:21:54 PM

classic isn't dead!

classic fanboys aren't maybe, but you guys had to be pretty braindead to support it to begin with. Oh no, you're one of these "subtle" fanboys who claimed to "only" support 2MB2MB2MB2MB2MB, right? Cool

Everyone knows Adam, Classic and XT had ZERO to do with scaling, because they weren't credible scaling solutions by any metric, they were designed to slowly strangle Bitcoin (if Gavin Andresen had his way, we'd have 20MB blocks right now, and there'd no chance that people like me could maintain my Bitcoin node).

So, for the umpteenth time, if you haven't got anything sensible to say, be quiet

with thinblocks and other improvements you probably could run a node from home with 100MB blocks ( provided you have a unlimit BW plan, somthing in the order of 50-100$/month )
not that i care if individual users have to run SPV clients while full node are ran by 1000's of businesses.
what you dismiss as a scaling solution is infact the classical scaling solution.
and you fail to understand that centralization of accessibility to TX on the blockchain is infinitely worse then node centralization.