Quote from: Inaba on January 18, 2013, 11:08:02 PM

Sorry Bitsyncom, but you are completely full of shit. Completely. You have repeatedly stated that it's "impossible" to do things, yet somehow BFL manages to do the "imposisble."

Uh, no it doesn't.

See BFL @ CES 2013.

Quote from: Inaba on January 18, 2013, 11:08:02 PM

Why do you continually prod me with a stick?

Change the word stick with Fact and you have a conversation worth holding.

BitSyncom stated that BFL would not be ready as claimed. They weren't. See the posting on BFL forums for that.

BitSyncom also stated that a production of ASIC is a known process governed by physics. It is a predictable process. Again Josh refutes this in his ignorance.

What happened in January? (30 days later)

They still didn't have the chips ready. Was this predictable based on the manifacturing cycle? Yes.

----------------------------

Now Bitsyncom is providing more claims, that a package change cannot be done on "a whim". That it would require significant changes?

In all of your post you do not deny this. Here take a look at what you wrote:

Quote from: Inaba on January 18, 2013, 11:08:02 PM

I have left you alone to go do your own thing with your ancient technology and your ridiculously immense power requirements, yet you want to keep antagonizing me. Why is that?

Because he is in the same buisness as you. And knows enough about making ASIC (even if on a larger process) to know when you are pulling a bullshit stunt to buy "extra time".

Which is...coincidentally....the trend.

Quote from: Inaba on January 18, 2013, 11:08:02 PM

I really hope you have something to show on Monday, you have about 24 hours to produce, so we'll see then.

Josh levels the demand just days before having told his customers (paraphrased):

"It will be ready in another month. Just wait. Oh, and I have some goodies of more pictures for you to contend with."

Quote from: Inaba on January 18, 2013, 11:08:02 PM

The fact of the matter is, though, no one is going to buy your 1990's tech after we ship, so enjoy the few weeks of glory you will have if you can manage to ship a working product that doesn't melt.

LOL, in one breath he states the age of the process was developed and used in the world of technology, but gladfully omits that 90nm and 65nm was developed almost ten years ago.

Does that put things into perspective? Nah. Blowing more smoke.

Oh, and he finishes it off "professionally" with a "so enjoy the few weeks of glory you will have if you can manage to ship a working product that doesn't melt."

Which is coincidentally what happened to his plastic packaged BFL ASICs when they were checked in December. (keep in mind we are now in the later fringes of Mid-January)

You can't make this kind of comedy up!

Quote from: Inaba on January 18, 2013, 11:08:02 PM

PS - Your last few sentences are interesting. Are you having some issues with heat and have to throttle back a bit to fix the the issue?

Said by the guy who's chips melted....

(Ah, by the way, bASIC was going to release 1.4w per GH/s chips @ 90nm)

(BFL is now going to release up to 1.2w per GH/s chips @ 65nm)

Heh.