Quote from: suchmoon on April 25, 2016, 07:45:22 PM

Quote from: crptoarch on April 25, 2016, 07:16:53 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on April 25, 2016, 03:19:48 PM

Quote from: crptoarch on April 25, 2016, 06:27:17 AM

Quote from: Gleb Gamow on April 25, 2016, 05:28:43 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on April 24, 2016, 11:29:39 PM

Quote from: bitmaster1x on April 24, 2016, 07:30:59 PM

You realize there's other communities on there

You talking to me? How does having other communities make StakeMiners more legit? Deflection much?

And his Crypto-city.com site is blocking IPs.

I have been a member here for a few months maybe. I have used this forum for a couple years. I have visited Crypto-city.com. I am not sure if I understand you guys. I saw the links to other forums, and you seem to be saying crypto-city is some kind of scam right? How exactly can a community driven website who does not collect payments be some kind of scam. I guess you could say that both this forum and the other one you guys keep referring to could also be scam sites right? They both allow scammers and unethical situations to occur on their site right? So, explain to me what makes those 2 websites any different from what you are accusing this site of?

Bitcointalk has a trust rating system. Not sure what other site you're referring to but if it's gethashing - they don't have self-moderated threads. Crypto-city is allowing scammers to moderate their own "communities". Sure bad things can happen anywhere. There is a big difference though between that and actively supporting such scams.

I think we all can agree the trust rating system here can not be trusted, I have read the horror stories. For example, this Gleb Gamow character has green trust and a very convincing scam thread against himself actually, where plenty of proof shows he was caught stealing from someone. Plus he admitted to it anyways so what better proof do you need than his own confession. So what makes him at all trustworthy to deserve green trust? There is plenty of other pretty disturbing stuff in that thread that is way more convincing than anything I have read posted from him so far in the 12 handfuls of threads he participates in religiously. Do you see what Gleb Gamow does, are the moderators here not allowing a self admitted thief to do as he pleases? In all seriousness what he does is a crime in itself, multiple ones actually, from cyber-bullying clear down to libel. Using this site as an example of a trustworthy community is like saying Silk Road was the best place to buy video cards for your computer.

What Scammers is Crypto-City allowing to moderate their own communities. The more important question is, if it is their own community why should they not be allowed to control who is welcome and who is not. If they do not want someone in a certain community bringing drama, and all someone wants to do is cause drama, why should it be allowed? What do you consider "supporting" scams?

I like Crypto-City I have learned a whole lot more there in the little time I have been there than this place has offered in years. I like that you can actually have live chat with the community owners. It has so much more to offer services and coin developers than a regular forum can provide. What I really like is that there is none of this drama there. What I notice here is when new people actually need help with something, when they ask for assistance, they usually get yelled at, condemned, told not to do something. Rarely do you see a person actually get the help he asks for. At Crypto-City, I ask questions they are answered in live chat if I want. I don't have to wait a day, or week or even months and no response at all, I can get the answers right now. I even had help setting up wallets that I could not get to work, you can get Peers files or addnodes, these guys will actually take time out of a busy day to help you.

Congrats Owen, you figured out how to create sockpuppets. Perhaps there is still hope that you'll find a minute to comment on your securities fraud.

If your crypto-city is so great why do you need to shill for it in this awful forum?

Yep, Chantha Owen Lueung is a fuckin' genius! First he embraces Leroy Fodor either my accident or by design. Then, the community brings to his attention that he's made a very bad choice. Upon Owen reviewing the evidence (none by me, for I came late to the party), he not only opts to ignore the evidence, but justifies it, calling those who've presented the evidence trolls. Enter me, Bruno Kucinskas, the convicted child rapist (it's all over the Internet, so apologies for not providing a link, but if you find one, I'll will exit the crypto space forever), who opted to join the already strong choir. Owen, being the genius he is, opts to take a page from Leroy Fodor's playbook and try to dis me. You go, girlfriend! Results? His entire crypto ring is in the process of being expose, all which could've been avoided if Owen truly were a genius and simply distance himself from Leroy Fodor whereupon an unlube microscrope wouldn't currently be stuck up his ass. Yes, it was that simple - distance yourself from Leroy Fodor. So, here we are, Owen creating sockpuppets to further dis me to no avail while I, among others, WILL bring down his little empire. Let this be a warning to all you folks who have their meals prepared on the floor - eventually the brain begins to cease functioning properly after consuming so much crud, with the symptoms lasting for years as the following well demonstrates. HAHAHA

Quote from: thunderjet on April 24, 2016, 06:17:47 AM

Quote from: Gleb Gamow on April 24, 2016, 02:37:44 AM

Quote from: ThePhwner on April 23, 2016, 09:24:58 PM

Quote from: fakecryptsynagger on April 23, 2016, 04:17:59 AM

http://bitcoinscamphinnaeusgage.blogspot.ae/?m=1

Bitcoin Scam Protect - Phinnaeus Gage
Saturday, August 23, 2014
Phinnaeus Gage: The Story of an Internet Troll Pt. 5

I want to make my intentions clear. I am not trying to bully Mr. Burno Kucinskas . I am trying to...
Phinnaeus Gage: The Story of an Internet Troll Pt. 4

Why am I dedicating a whole blog for a guy I have never met in my life? Thats a good question. T...
Friday, August 22, 2014
Phinnaeus Gage: The Story of an Internet Troll Pt. 3

Phinnaeus Gage (Bruno Kucinskas) Mr. Bruno Kucinskas , or maybe its better if I use his pseudonym Phinnaeus Gage, is still active on t...
Wednesday, August 20, 2014
Phinnaeus Gage: The Story of an Internet Troll Pt. 2

Many months have passed and I still havent bought the miners I was initially planning to buy. My...
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
Phinnaeus Gage - The Story of an Internet Troll Pt.1

Phinnaeus Gage . I happened to bump into this guy's online profile on a bitcoin related foru...

So for the record, you're a fucking idiot. Aside from the incomprehensible "English" in these posts, what's your point? And if Gleb really is Bruno/Phineas/whatever, DOES THAT MEAN PAUL VERNON DIDN'T STEAL MY FUCKING LITECOINS? Grow up dipshit. And use Google Translate before you post.

That blog is maintained by Joshua Zipkin of AMT, another dude who stole millions from his clients. He created it after he threaten to kill me and I filed a police report who went to his Masonic Lodge office address for over a week to no avail, Josh perhaps already in Bulgaria.

Ironically, I have not fear of him really killing me, hence didn't need to file a restraining order on his scammy ass, unlike Josh Zerlan who felt threaten by me because I posted a pic of his master bathroom gleaned from the Internet taken two years before him moving into the BTC-House, filing for protection four months after the fact. The reason for his actions? Because he and BFL were highly pissed off of my investigations that include funneling info to the FBI, IRS, etc., with Bruce Bourne being instrumental in having Josh pursue the charges.

So, when I started on Leroy Fodor's ass, he thought it be wise to start a scam thread on my scammy ass using info from another scammer and include some bullshit about me being a child raper as his defense against me for posting about all his lies. Now, Leroy has Owen Lueung doing the same exact thing, even being instrumental (assumed) in getting me banned last night for 24 hours). I would've been banned for a week, but because I'm an excellent ball cupper and get paid for my postings according to Leroy Fodor, the mods felt like a token 24h ban was warranted to appease whomever.

That said, I look forward to having a pleasant convo on the phone with Owen.

It seems that Chantha Owen Lueung was banned from FINRA in April 2005 ,because he:

" fraudulently recommended and sold the
securities of a certain company to public customers. NASD
found that Lueung told his customers that he conducted an
appropriate investigation and reasonable due diligence into
the company, but failed to do so. The findings also stated that
Lueung made material misrepresentations about the
companys securities and failed to disclose material adverse
facts that he was or should have been aware of, including the
companys financial condition. NASD also found that Lueung
made statements about the company and its business,
including stock price projections and guarantees, for which he
had no basis. (NASD Case #CLG050016)"

https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/DisciplinaryAction/p013826.pdf

http://www.rrbdlaw.com/RegulatoryLinks/CASESOFNOTE/NASD/2005.htm?print=1

Quote from: bitmaster1x on April 25, 2016, 10:17:02 PM

Quote from: suchmoon

Congrats ... you figured out how to create sockpuppets. Perhaps there is still hope that you'll find a minute to comment on your securities fraud.

Sock puppet? Fraud? I believe you're smarter than what you just stated. Tell me I'm not wrong. You're reading comprehension obviously needs work.

Hey, Owen, look. Evidence depicting you as a thief in your own venerated thread. Like I said, you're a fuckin' genius. HAHAHA