Quote from: Myraidcoins on April 27, 2016, 04:06:06 AM

Quote from: myriadcoin on April 27, 2016, 12:10:34 AM

Quote from: solid12345 on April 26, 2016, 06:56:24 PM

Myriad I think was sunk large in part due to the connection to Bryce Weiner and his Liberdad scheme that never panned out (as if there was even a real plan...),
don't remember if the team was involved but perception is reality. He is a 1-man coin wrecking crew.

Nah, Myriad never really had anything to do with him. He was the adamastor of Myriad, lol. It tanked back in the day for 3 reasons: Bitcoin tanked, Myriad's inflation was high compared to most alts, and I think Myriad supporters lost hope for a while when DGB copied it and claimed to be the original, then had a huge pump after some reward changing trickery and their 250k investment.

Also multi-algo has had some critical issues in the past, much like Bitcoin did in the early days.

Digibyte price is starting to come down to reality. Dropped 75% since the peak of the pump, marketing can't keep the price elevated forever, they have a lot of issues with syncing wallets and non functioning wallets. I hope AUR didn't copy digibytes problems into their code.

Multi-Algo is not for lazies, it will take a lot of your time to maintain, 5 times the algos also means 5 times the work but everything good in life comes with more effort.

If code is copied also you also get the problems iembedded n the code, true. But in this case sync problems are most likely because of the blocktime. The internet is not capable (yet)of maintaining a 15 second mesh. It also depends on the blocksize i.e. the number of transactions in the blocks. Aurora did not need a Visa like transaction volume so to be sure we did go for 61 seconds. It's fast enough to do a massive transaction volume even with 1 Mb blocksize and long enough to get blocks propagated around the globe thus preventing a high orphanrate or worse forking.