Quote from: s3v3nh4cks on April 27, 2016, 06:37:38 PM

Quote from: kbhutto on April 27, 2016, 06:31:24 PM

Quote from: s3v3nh4cks on April 27, 2016, 06:20:40 PM

Quote from: kbhutto on April 27, 2016, 06:17:21 PM

IMO at this stage focus should be on implementing proposed tech and usability instead of aesthetic changes.

Quote from: s3v3nh4cks on April 27, 2016, 05:18:59 PM

OK guys and gals.. I did end up finding crz that Danonthehill suggested, his work is "Outstanding", but with that quality, comes a cost. a significant one. He has asked for a budget, so I need to guage what everyone thinks.

If you want to see a sample of his work, check out this link;

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.0

To start he is willing to redesign the the BCT ANN, Coin Logo and Default Wallet Design.

I am sure this would take us to a higher level of professionalism, but I need to hear your thoughts before I create a budgetary proposal for his work.

The Tech is happening regardless of any other options, it just takes time. We have a whole plethora of items in the works to be integrated into the wallet over the next few updates.

Yes, it takes time, I can surely understand...questioning anything related to it wasn't my intention.....I meant will it have any positive impact at this stage if a significant amount is utilized for aesthetic changes?

Well, that is a great question, and I am sure it could help to some degree, but mainly I was doing the research as I am trying to follow up on every suggestion that is posted by Masternode owners to see how viable something is.

That's exactly why I have interest in this coin!