Quote from: Lauda on April 29, 2016, 04:21:41 PM

Quote from: Enjorlas on April 29, 2016, 03:37:50 PM

Yes it has. Did you go to the link?

No, it hasn't. Do you even know that website works? They just have a lot of transactions of lesser value that have totaled ~1.8 Million.

Quote from: pereira4 on April 29, 2016, 03:42:20 PM

My argument is that bitcoin does indeed have a big lack of privacy due the fungibility problem,

'Big lack'? No. Frangibility is indeed a problem, but not something that I'd call big/huge else that would be the main priority (which it isn't.

Quote from: pereira4 on April 29, 2016, 03:42:20 PM

the fact that smarter people than us that know the protocol better than us like Greg Maxwell agrees with this only further proves my point. But like I said before, they are working to improve it.

"Smarter people than us"? I'd rather that you not put me in the same bag as yourself or the other people that fall under your usage of "us".

Quote from: Cynocephalus on April 29, 2016, 04:15:02 PM

It would be a very pleasant experience to hack this address..And probably many machines right now trying this..

No. Read the previous posts.

Lol dude, gmaxwell is smarter than both us convinced at least when it comes to programing and knows Bitcoin better than us, and he agrees with the fact that Bitcoin has a fungibility problem which is already being addressed with solutions like CoinJoin and Confidential Transactions. Stop thinking Bitcoins privacy is good enough otherwise we would never improve it with that mentality.