Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 02, 2016, 12:38:01 AM

Quote from: ProfessionalGoogler on May 02, 2016, 12:14:26 AM

Anyone taking this guy seriously on anything he says is pretty delusional.

You would have a more intelligent conversation with a 13 year old programmer.

OP fails, offer something better then - oh wait you can't.

He often ends things with "oh need months to explain" "too complex to explain" etc when in reality he is the type to over complicate even something simple beyond understanding and would fail explaining why 2+2=4 to anyone.

In other words - he is full of shit.

If you believe you are correct, then since I am not anonymous and my reputation is at stake, please provide your real identity so your personal reputation will be destroyed when you are proven to have been embarrassingly wrong in your ad hominem statements.

Btw, this isn't helping you. Astute readers can read and ascertain the level of my competence. Your remaining days of being not totally ignored are numbered.

Note I have flagged your post to the moderator since it is ad hominem trolling a technical thread. You provided no technical arguments.

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 03, 2016, 02:16:14 AM

Quote from: sidhujag on May 02, 2016, 06:01:09 AM

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 02, 2016, 12:25:24 AM

[1] Find my posts in this thread and note that TierNolan is one of the original inventors of the DE protocol, but it had a jamming flaw until I fixed it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1364951.0

How altruistic you are anonymint! Yes so jealous

Why do you assume my point was about altruism Huh

Maybe I am just pointing out that I am more important than you belittle me.

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 03, 2016, 02:24:52 AM

Quote from: BulglaryWizard on May 02, 2016, 09:28:52 PM

Exactly. MA does worse than a coinlip on average. His reverals target "forecasting" is so hilarious I can't understand how he is able to even publish shit like that Grin

I'll bet he counts on that enough people reading do not understand trading and markets at all, or backtesting.

Quote from: sidhujag on May 02, 2016, 05:48:05 AM

well my financial astrologist does the same thing... planets affect moods. He says dow 32k with usd and us equities rising together (which already started). Hes bearish gold. Has never really been that wrong.

Hey idiots as I had explained before in the quote below, the point is the investor can react to the market action with greater than 50% odds. You guys are too dumb to understand that a prediction for a static point in time with no conditionals, is a point sample and point samples are subject to aliasing error; thus MA does not provide such ridiculous point sample predictions. You try to force his statements to be point sample predictions, thus it is unsurprising that you see his statements as a failure. I won't bother to explain fundamental relevant science to you such as the Shannon-Nyquist Sampling Theorem, Fractals, and Chaos Theory, because you are too dumb to understand.

Armstrong is for smart people. The low IQ trolls need not apply.

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 01, 2016, 10:46:43 PM

The benchmarks stated that the USA dollar and and USA stocks had to start moving in unison as another criteria and if this wasn't the case, then the benchmark low would be pushed out in time until they do.

Thus none of his predictions have failed. Those who expect him to say "this will happen on this date" are building a strawman illogic, because MA never predicts such. His method is to provide a "if this, then that" analysis of the computer model's outputs.

[...]

MA's model provides key dates and it provides indications such as "Panic Cycle", "Directional Change", etc. on each asset analyzed. His model also provides "if this, then that" benchmarks on price reversals in both directions.

From this, the speculator can watch the market and try to interpret how the real world is matching the model and then infer decisions with a much better than 50% probability.

Something important does always happen on the ECM turn dates. For example:

[...]

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 03, 2016, 02:32:31 AM

Quote from: minor-transgression on May 02, 2016, 09:55:35 PM

I'd add that the Elite have less control than you suggest...

Who is you? I had written the same point:

Quote from: TPTB_need_war on May 02, 2016, 01:46:40 AM

Edit: you also believe in the totality of the elite's "monopoly" control.