Quote from: Pablo Elpuro on May 05, 2016, 08:06:52 PM

Quote from: Gleb Gamow on May 05, 2016, 07:24:31 PM

I'm still taken aback on how David Kleiman was awarded soldier of the year in 1987 after ONLY one year of service while being a Huey tech in Germany, beating out a million-plus candidates, some of which were perhaps more deserving.

Hi Gleb, I dont understand, why you quote me in this relation. I didnt award him.
As far as I can estimate, Dave Kleiman was a very impressive soldier. One has-to-get the laurels, all are only humans. He was a deputy of sheriff before his accident, too. I can imagine him deputy-of-the-year-award capable too. An astonishing imagination of Satoshi Nakamoto, of course. But state-power-critical means not subversive. There is a subtle difference. The libertarians are not against the state, but against the overregulation of the state, against the attraction of too much responsability of the state. Dave was working for the state and for international institutions. A libertarian approach is to make for the state, what is good, and to refuse the what is too much. He wasnt engaged fix nomore. He was very well able to refuse jobs. I see no conflict to Satoshi here, no incompatibility.

Quote from: Gleb Gamow on May 05, 2016, 07:24:31 PM

Also, he claimed to be a war veteran when he didn't serve in a war zone because ... wait for it ... the US wasn't involved in any conflicts during his stint in the US Army.

I dont know. I never heard about. Was he saying veteran or war-veteran? Was he maybe saying "war-veteran"? We are used to talk in metaphors, what are not takeable literally always.
Little overdrive is not unusual, isnt it, Gleb? Grin

I caught the "overdrive" reference. No prob with that, bud. Apologies for quoting you then going on a different tangent. My thought was to help get the thread back on topic. That was all.

Unless Craig Steven Wright's lawyer(s) lied to a tax agent: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2644013/20140226-Meeting-Minutes-Redacted.txt

Quote

Craig Wright had mined a lot of Bitcoins. Craig then took the Bitcoins and put them into a
Seychelles Trust. A bit of it was also put into Singapore. This was run out of an entity from the
UK. Craig had gotten approximately 1.1 million Bitcoins. There was a point in time, when he had
around 10% of all the Bitcoins out there. Mr Kleiman would have had a similar amount. However,
Mr Kleiman passed away during that time. He was a war veteran; he was wheel chair bound.
The deed between Craig Wright and W&K was created in 2012. W&K gave Craig Wrights rights
to the Bitcoins and he has used the Bitcoins to do all this stuff.

Mr Kleiman and Craig Wright decided to start up W&K because they both wanted to get involved
with Bitcoins. They recognised that this industry was not regulated and they wanted to start up a
regulated Bitcoin bank. They knew they couldnt do this in the US so they wanted to do this in
Australia.

Back to Joseph VaughnPerling. Remember when the following video came out and folks were asking who invited CSW? Wanna take a stab now as to who it was?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdvQTwjVmrE

My EDUCATED guess is that J^VP is CSW's spokesperson advancing the "who is SN" narrative.