Quote from: Fatman3001 on May 07, 2016, 02:10:01 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on May 07, 2016, 02:01:24 AM

Quote from: Fatman3001 on May 07, 2016, 01:48:42 AM

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on May 07, 2016, 01:44:41 AM

I think the most sensible theory going is that Kleiman was the voice of Satoshi on this forum; the times during which our Satoshi posted seems to suggest he was doing it from the states. I think Wright probably wrote the white paper and had Kleiman edit it? And it was probably Wright communicating with Gavin by email.

Or not. But it has to have been someone, and a bunch of this stuff fits. Even if CSW happens to be some kind of nut. Let's face it...

JVP confirmed that CW was the Satashi Nakamoto he met in 2005. So if it's a scam then he's in on it too.

Looks like the two of you want to use scant evidence and nearly pure conjecture to continue this matter when more easily and readily available means to prove (if CW had been involved as Satoshi) exist and are not being employed... in other words, you are attempting to spread FUCD... based on pure conjecture when the actual direct evidence and logic supports the contrary conclusion that Wright is a credential reliant, fucking phoney and wanna be scam artist.

I think you're right in saying that he's a "wanna be scam artist" atm. Unintentionally, of course, but it doesn't happen often so let's celebrate it.

Maybe it is just me, but I don't see how you could be either a scam artist or a "wanna be scam artist" "unintentionally"?

My understanding of the term (and how I was using the term) "scam artist" has intentionality built into it... otherwise the conduct does not rise to the level of "scam artist.".. .