Quote from: aliashraf on May 07, 2016, 11:42:28 AM

Quote from: AgentofCoin on May 06, 2016, 09:30:47 PM

Quote from: aliashraf on May 06, 2016, 07:47:38 PM

...
In Dr. Wright's Case, he had to convince people by:
1- Showing his absolute and deep knowledge and vision
2- Convincing people, trust worthy people, who know Satoshi better
3- Presenting his deep concerns and good intentions about the technology under consideration
4- Using his reputation and background as a respected, honest , trust worthy person
5- Putting forward his new and solid ideas about the future
6- Reasoning about his disappearance
7- Justifying his decision to reveal his Identity

And I think he has almost done all of this!
...

You are most likely a sock puppet of CSW or of his group.

Here are appropriate answers to your list to help determine is CSW is Satoshi:
1. Irrelevant. This information is speculative and doesn't determine if he is Satoshi.
2. Irrelevant. This information is speculative and doesn't determine if he is Satoshi.
3. Irrelevant. This information is speculative and doesn't determine if he is Satoshi.
4. Irrelevant. This information is speculative and doesn't determine if he is Satoshi.
5. Irrelevant. The issue here is the past and this doesn't determine if he is Satoshi.
6. Irrelevant. This information is speculative and doesn't determine if he is Satoshi.
7. Irrelevant. This information is speculative and doesn't determine if he is Satoshi.

According to your list, I have done everything you listed except number 2 so far.
So all I have to do is convince Gavin and three others, and you will go to bat for me?

...
Now putting it the way you like and hypothetically rejecting my test or similar 'speculative' check lists ...
What's your alternative? How does Satoshi have to convince you to be himself? With PKs? This is it? He should mathematically prove what? Possessing some bit strings exactly proves what (other than possessing them)? ....Rejected!
Any other alternatives? Don't think so.
...
Craig Wright's Satoshi claim is not about registering some transaction in Blockchain or any GL ... It is about love, it is about appreciation and respect, it is about humanity, it can not be measured by some naive and preliminary branch of mathematics, analytical mathematics.

You are definitely in the wrong community if you believe that is what Bitcoin is about or should
be about. This is the internet, bitcoin is the currency of the internet, and the internet is not a land
of love, trust, appreciation, and respect. Bitcoin is designed to work in this environment.

The first fundamental purpose of Bitcoin was to make provable that which should not be trusted.
So in other words, Bitcoin was created to counter or prevent human influence and human trust.
You either control the keys or you do not. Satoshi is well aware of this rule. He taught it first.

All that Craig Wright has to do is show some cryptographic proof to the community that can be
reasonably associated with Satoshi in some provable way (sign message with block 0 or 9) and
then we can discuss everything you want to talk and consider, because then and only then is it
worthwhile to even entertain those stories and explanations. The keys do not prove that he is
Satoshi, but the fact that he has them at all, will allow us to listen and take him more seriously.

When a police officer pulls someone over for an alleged offense, the officer doesn't request all
reasons and explanations and stories. The officer first wants proof of who you are. After that,
then you can attempt to explain away the alleged offense.

In this case, the Officer (Community) is requesting the alleged Offender (Craig Wright) to provide
his Identification (private key message signing). The offender (person falsely claiming to be Satoshi)
will not comply and instead wants to explain away why he is not an offender. This is inappropriate
and the officer would arrest (flame and doubt) the offender for not complying with the officers
reasonable requests for ID.

You are saying the Officer should not require ID and accept the offenders story as is.