Quote from: noobtrader on May 08, 2016, 04:29:47 PM

Quote from: generalizethis on May 08, 2016, 04:01:26 PM

Quote from: noobtrader on May 08, 2016, 03:33:51 PM

i dont get it

That's why I explained it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443867.0

Can't make it any clearer (unless cognitive dissonance, or worse, is the real problem).

BTW, masternodes compound the problem of mining centralization, so stating a problem to explain the need for a new problem is not what you are doing here (though it's still weird logic) you are actually adding another problem that is most likely worse--and, in dash's case, is worse.

Also, I don't watch markets that much, but is there a corollary between masternodes and stable price? Both XMR and dash seem to have similar price fluctuations. If that's true, then your original argument goes out the window (masternodes=price stability). Aren't there already benefits to miners and services running full-nodes? If so, then increased mining and services should correspond with node increase.

Although even the incentivized node as price stabilizer isn't really a valid argument in itself. Unless you account for the coins being removed from the market, you aren't really saying nodes are creating the upward or stabilizing pressure--you could very turn the argument to, "Why doesn't dash have a CryptoKingdom style game to stabilize the price?" Wink

i dont get it because my FUD is dihonest, with masternodes you can control voting so there is centralization. your dash whale might hodl 50% of dash coin and he is swinging price like a toy. so there is your centralization, how would you prevent ppl from dumping all their dash when close up their node Huh

If you aren't going to bother reading, I'm not going to bother explaining--I'll just fix your mistakes. Wink