Quote from: King Leo on May 09, 2016, 04:10:53 PM

Quote from: jambola2 on May 09, 2016, 03:26:12 PM

Quote from: King Leo on May 09, 2016, 02:55:02 PM

*snip*

Quoting proves nothing if you don't verify the signed message.

Not sure if you're trying to pad your post count, or just replying with incomplete knowledge.

By quoting, I am verifying that this is the original unedited message, to prevent a hacker from editing the message which his own address and signature.
Since I have quoted it, even if it is edited, anybody can look at the text within my quote and verify it themselves.

This is the exact same reason Gavin's testimony about Craig Wright's signature being true was not worth listening to. Signing is supposed to mean that you don't take anybody's word and verify it yourself. You should not take my word that the signature is right, and verify it yourself. By quoting, my job is not to ensure that the signature is correct, but just that the signature has not been changed since it was posted.

I'm not sure if you're just generally unintelligent or if you don't know what you are talking about, If someone hacked the account, they could easily edit the thread and get it deleted, that is, if they know what they are doing.

Quoting is a wast of time, should have just went and verify the message and leave a link to the verified message, No-one will take your word if you don't post a link to the verified message. I verified the message myself but you don't see me asking people to take my word.

edit: Strange how you think I want to pad my post count when you are the one quoting messages with a paid signature

Dude, what the fuck are you talking about? The message was quoted for the reason provided, and it's a good one. And if you verified the message yourself, why did you not post proof? Noob.