Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Mirrax's HIGH RISK altcoin investment guide for 2016
by
AmDD
on 12/05/2016, 13:49:57 UTC
Quote from: Conqueror on May 12, 2016, 01:30:17 PM
Quote from: remistevens on May 12, 2016, 12:45:03 PM
Quote from: Conqueror on May 12, 2016, 10:19:01 AM
Quote from: ChekaZ on May 12, 2016, 10:04:42 AM
Quote from: ftcorbsup on May 11, 2016, 07:52:39 PM
miraks is scammer
http://forum.feathercoin.com/topic/8482/block-accounts/36

I have to confirm that. - Mirrax = Conquerer just for clarification.

Regards,
ChekaZ

I am not miraks or Conquerer.
Right spelling is Mirrax/Conqueror

The link about is FTC team opinion which i do not share.
In fact i see such accusations as wrong and not acceptable.
This decision is huge shame for FTC team and will not be forgotten.


Sorry if I have this wrong, but here is what it looks to me what happened:

Kraken gave Mirrax 100000FTC to deliver as bounty for smart contract implementation. When the price shot up, Kraken gave direction to sell the FTC for BTC at 9500. Mirrax sold the coins at 4000 instead before it got that high. Now Kraken is asking for the funds returned and Mirrax is refusing to send anything (not 100000FTC, not 9.5BTC, not 4BTC). Is that correct? And are you the person making this decision to hold these funds? If so why? They were dedicated for smart contract creation, so the only person who should have a right to keep the funds indefinitely is the person who develops smart contracts for FTC.

Again sorry if I have this wrong, but what am I missing? What accusations are unacceptable?
Please add into your puzzle that I was the only one who made any progress in that particular bounty by myself.


If thats true then it just adds another layer that I dont like. If you are holding the bounty then Id think you should be a neutral 3rd party and not be eligible to receive it yourself. Not to put all blame on you, I also dont like that you were told to sell at 9000. If Kraken wanted to sell at that price even if only to increase the bounty by selling high and buying low) then it should have been done with other funds and then added to the bounty. The original bounty coins should have been kept offline on a wallet and not touched for any reason other than to pay a user for meeting the goals of the bounty or returning to Kraken after a set time has passed of no one meeting set goals.

Mirrax, I find it difficult to believe you are truly a scammer and hope this all is resolved soon. That said, Im not taking sides here as I dont like the way any of this was handled - by either party.