It's called grid trading. I do it with a bot on eth_btc. And I can tell you that in two sentences, or three if you count this one.
You can call it whatever you want, including uncle bob, if you chose not to explain specifics, which had included applying practice to theory and also responding to issues/questions raised by someone else on a forum.
And, by the way, you are welcome.

Fine, if you want specifics: I use a Classical 1, 4, 9 MacNeill-Schumann hybrid for the main engine, sinewave recursion on the re-entry and a modified Gauss to calculate relative oscillation weight to maximise profits on the downside. I didn't bother stating this in my previous post because I knew you wouldn't understand it. Still 3 sentences though.
You are correct. I am not engaged in any kind of programming of a bot(s) to trade BTC, so I do not understand those terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment.
Furthermore, I do not understand how or if you may have tailored any of those referred to methodologies to achieve your own objectives in any kind of meaningful way or if you may have screwed them up or learned them over time through trial and error.
More or less, I explained my personally tailored approach in laymen's terms which boils down to what I tend to do mostly manually under various circumstances rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios. You may have noticed that I am not a bot, even though you assert that you have been engaged in programming one or more bots, no?
In any event, it doesn't really matter too much how many words I chose to use because that's within my discretion.
In your first post, you inquired regarding what I was doing, and you seemed to make a variety of incorrect assumptions and assertions. I used my discretion and prerogatives, as a human, to attempt to respond to that.
Subsequently, I learned that you prefer to act a bit like a pretentious and self-righteous turd, and surely that is within your own discretion to determine your tone and your approach and to determine whether you want to explain your situation in terms of conclusions and abstractions, or to engage in any kind of meaningful attempt to explain with details what you are doing to the extent that anyone may be interested in your methodology, if it is actually true.
If you did not have such an asshole disposition, I might be curious to find out a bit more regarding what you are doing and your historical experiences, even though your practices, to the extent that any of it could be true seems to differ a bit from what I have been doing.. Furthermore, your choices regarding how you explain your supposed system seem to be a bit combative and annoying, so maybe it is not so interesting for me to ask for any more details than those sparse ones that you have already chosen to provide.