Quote from: BitconAssociation on May 13, 2016, 12:59:52 PM

Quote from: BlindMayorBitcorn on May 13, 2016, 12:22:19 PM

You are correct. I am not engaged in any kind of brevity, which is to say terseness, to trade BTC, so I find it conducive to extensively expound those, my terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment or in foreseeable future, which is already priced in.

Furthermore, I do not understand how or if I may have tailored any of those referred to methodologies to achieve certain objectives in any kind of meaningful way or if you may have screwed them up or learned them over time through trial and error.

More or less, I explained my personally tailored approach in laymen's terms which boils down to what I tend to do mostly manually under various circumstances, which is posting long meandering posts, one of which I am in the process of currently posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post presently, rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios. My posts, such as they are, that is to say remaining invariably long under any and all circumstances, remain invariably long. You may or may not have noticed that I am not a bot, even though you assert that you have been engaged in programming one or more bots, no? Or yes?

In any event, it doesn't really matter too much how many words I chose, because, as I have emphatically stated and/or typed in this very post, which I am currently in the process of typing, I am currently in the process of currently posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post presently, rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios. My patterns never vary, fuckhead! To use many words is within my discretion, and that's what I discretion to do.
That's how I roll.

In your first post, you inquired regarding what I was doing, to which I answered you that "I am in the process of currently posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post consequently, rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a different variety of scenarios." You seemed to make a variety of incorrect assumptions and/or assertions. I used my discretion and prerogatives, which is to day I typed, as a human, to attempt to respond to that.

Subsequently, I explained my personally tailored approach in laymen's terms which boils down to what I tend to do mostly manually under various circumstances, which is posting long meandering posts, one of which I am in the process of currently posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post presently, rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios. My posts, such as they are, remain invariably long under any and all conditions. You, asshole, learned that you prefer to act a bit like a pretentious and self-righteous turd possessing the consistency of clam chowder. It should be clear from my previous lengthy posts (of which this post, the one I am currently in the process of posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post presently, will soon become), if you have even bother to read them, which is unlikely, jusdging from the dum things you say because of your lack of comprehension, and surely that is within your own discretion to determine your tone and your approach and to determine whether you want to explain your situation in terms of conclusions and abstractions, or to engage in any kind of meaningful attempt to explain with details what you are doing to the extent that anyone may be interested in your methodology, if it is actually true.

If you did not have such an asshole disposition, I might be curious to find out a bit more regarding what you are doing and your historical experiences. Which you don't. So I won't. Fuck you.

No one I know has listened to it all the way through, including myself. It is not meant to be. --Lou Reed, liner notes

Well played Lambie, well played