Because Guy can't delete my posts in this thread, he instead keeps posting the same giant post again and again.
In order to prove that (3) is the right scenario as he claims, dogie needs to post such receipt + invoice. So far dogie refused to post such a receipt + invoice.
I don't need to do anything of the sort. You still haven't explained why you want to see that I've paid solicitor's fees, it literally makes no sense other than you've gone off the deep end. Why don't you post your invoice for all four of your solicitors?
Note: It's highly irregular (read: never heard of) to post security of funds deposit to one's lawyer as dogie claimed.
This just in, CEO of a company has never heard of paying creditors! What a weird concept.
This is why we asked the court to force dogie to deposit the security of funds directly to the court.
You asked the court to do many things and newsflash you're still on the hook.
Dogie's lawyer tried to prevent the security of funds deposit with all sort of arguments initially
That's how it works? You were trying to request security of funds for a case you were never, ever, EVER going to win. Ever. Where are your security of funds?
The funds were indeed deposited before a liquidator was appointed and now the case is frozen.
You say that like you're proud that managed to ruin your company so much that even your ex-employees had to sue you. You screwed your employees, your investors, your creditors, BTCS and BTCS's shareholders but you show no remorse at all.
PS, if anyone should be posting receipts, it should be you posting your pay stubs along with an explanation of why staff and creditors were going unpaid.