Quote from: ax66 on May 14, 2016, 08:19:12 PM

Quote from: AngryDwarf on May 14, 2016, 08:16:13 PM

Quote from: ax66 on May 14, 2016, 07:28:39 PM

well my 24h+ testruns are over and i might say those 25-30% higher profitabilities
reported on zpool are non-existent, i get very similar btc from nicehash and zpool
the same algo (qubit, quark, x11).
so in the end block % is much closer to reality than shares %, not technically but for practical calcs.
unfortunately it seems impossible to construct a formula or even a good estimate
since zpool and NH use so different approaches

Based on a recent short multi-algo test on NH, I'd say zpool far outstrips NH, but maybe that can change with supply and demand of orders.
There are definitely some figures that don't seem to add up on zpool, whereas hashpower didn't seem to have the same problem. The latter pool though looks like it needs putting out of its misery at times.

it's important - i didn't run multi-algo, i ran one-algo per test on both,
just to see what really means if NH reports 0.15 and zpool 0.21,
but actually i get almost the same amount of btc.
i started that only because of those strange share % discrepancies

I have KBomba version of Minercontrol and his profit chart. StuffOfInterest made the original. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=769239.0
On the MC it shows the signals rate real time and nicehash throws out a lot of high payout signals for 1 minute to get auto miners to switch there...then the price drops to real time and miner is locked there for what ever settings you have except ..... MC It calls them outliers and bypasses them. Wink

The auto pools do it once in a while but at a realistic price.
Talking about profits .... down they go. Grin

I really should delete this info.