Quote from: Franz_Huber on May 27, 2016, 02:50:25 PM

Quote from: u848921 on May 27, 2016, 02:06:42 PM

You don't understand. None asked you to post shit about ION. This is not your coin not your investment why do you post shit. Do you post shit if someone invests in Apple stock? Team don't want answer stupid questions they want to work on games and coin let them work.

But you see, questions about an investment - before actually spending money on it - are not stupid. It's stupid of the ionomy team not to answer them. It's stupid to invest in ION with no answers being provided. The information we are asking for should have been on the ionomy website or in the whitepaper from day one of the ICO. The fact that there are no answers should be a big red flag.

Quote from: u848921 on May 27, 2016, 02:06:42 PM

Go to slack if you serious investor and ask Adam respecting questions don;t FUD and you will get answers.

Not true. Questions remained unanswered on Slack as well. But I will keep asking them, and so will others. Here are a few again:

How many masternodes does the ionomy team own?
How will ionomy work around Google's and Apple's rules prohibiting the use of third-party payment methods in mobile games?
Where exactly are the XPY that were supposed to be "burned"?
What will happen to the premined ION that the team controls?
What are the addresses of the premined ION coins, especially the ones that should have been sold in the ICO but weren't?
Where does the extra staking power come from when an electron electrifies a node?

ION FAQ: https://www.reddit.com/r/IONcoin/comments/4ku2da/ion_faq

Even if they pretend to answer it's still bullshit, like that company registration, or there was this one poster who said my math was wrong but then refused to correct it... here it is:

Quote from: Cayuga on May 20, 2016, 03:53:58 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on May 20, 2016, 03:51:29 PM

Quote from: Cayuga on May 20, 2016, 03:43:57 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on May 20, 2016, 03:42:02 PM

Quote from: Cayuga on May 20, 2016, 03:23:47 PM

Your math is not entirely wrong but it needs some corrections, btw I do not think there will be many "team" nodes in the beginning, i.e. less than 100. The majority online now are customer nodes.

Please correct then.

"less than 100" still sounds like more than 0, otherwise you would have just said 0, right?

Correct.

Are you going to elaborate on the problem with my math?

I will do that later, I have a dinner now, Amsterdam timezone Wink