@james.lent: If you make accusations, you are the one who has to deliver proof, if you turn it around, then I just ask to be consequent with it, so where is the proof that cryptodevil is not a child rapist? I do understand, that there is enough reason to be skeptical about doublebot which justify statements like "it looks like a scam" or something similar, but if you plainly say "it is a scam" it is defamation when you can not proof it. Regardless if your suspicion is correct or not. That is why I can not just say "Cryptodevil is a child rapist" even if this might be true, I just don't have proof.

Is that concept really that hard to grasp?

Edit: More than that, cryptodevil repeatedly stated here and on other places things like: No proof of not being a scam is proof of scam. This is just plain bullshit.