Quote from: antiuser1 on May 23, 2016, 12:36:27 PM

@james.lent: If you make accusations, you are the one who has to deliver proof, if you turn it around, then I just ask to be consequent with it, so where is the proof that cryptodevil is not a child rapist? I do understand, that there is enough reason to be skeptical about doublebot which justify statements like "it looks like a scam" or something similar, but if you plainly say "it is a scam" it is defamation when you can not proof it. Regardless if your suspicion is correct or not. That is why I can not just say "Cryptodevil is a child rapist" even if this might be true, I just don't have proof.

Is that concept really that hard to grasp?

To make an accusation like that you first need to have an event. We aren't making blind accusations. For someone who claims to be running trading bots, its not hard to show logs. Also every time you ask him to post it, he rants and cusses like a kid. You guys are giving bitcoins blindly to snavy in hopes of getting it back 'someday' but in true nature if someone is really trading it, there should be an option for the investor to divest anytime they want. Its like me asking you, 'hye mate, send me some coins...i'll return it back in some months doubled'. Sounds dodgy aint it ?