Quote from: PAPASO on February 01, 2013, 11:59:46 AM

Hi,

I am looking for help.a minning programming use IDQ QRNG(quantum random number).It's support LUNIX. www.idquantique.com
quantum random can do 3 level things,

Level 1
is computing known.like bitcoin key

Level 2
is computing unknown(future).if level 1 is ok,then start level 2

Background

The Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research laboratory explored the behavior of REG-driven robots under the influence of consciousness for many years (1). In lab conditions, the results were similar to other human-machine experiments: the devices behaved unusually, with statistical significance, in the direction of intent.

Separate studies by French scholar René Peoch suggested the same, yet rather than using human operators, Peoch used baby chicks (2). A randomly-driven robot was set up in a confined area, and it's movement was tracked and found to be consistent with expectations of random motion. Then the robot was introduced to motherless baby chicks, and "socialized" in a way known to cause psychological attachment. The robot was put back in the confined space and left to move around freely, yet this time, the baby chicks were situated in a cage next to the robot. After tracking the movement of the robot, they found that it clustered around wherever the chicks were, even to a statistically significant extent. The suggestion was that the baby chicks had influenced the random motion of the robot attempting to bring it near, just as the human operators had influenced the PEAR robot. http://www.psyleron.com

http://noosphere.princeton.edu
When human consciousness becomes coherent and synchronized, the behavior of random systems may change.

LOL., that whole global conciousness experiment at princeton is complete bullshit.
They look for fluctuations in random number generators at the time some big event happens.
But they fail to check if these fluctuations also occur when the big event doesnt happen.
This experiment and it claims should make any statistician cry and is a disgrace for the scientific community.
Based on the experiment setup they can never ever claim what they do.

They don't even exclude stuff like power fluctuations that could make a chip produce slightly different values.
There is just sooo much wrong with this particular experiment.