Quote from: Lauda on May 27, 2016, 10:45:41 AM

Quote from: exstasie on May 27, 2016, 08:06:57 AM

Quote from: Fatman3001 on May 27, 2016, 07:57:42 AM

You do understand how an agreement or a contract works, don't you?
Your buddies apparently signed on behalf of Core (it doesn't matter how you feel about it, they did) . The miners signed on behalf of their share of the mining industry.

You do understand how open source projects work, don't you? WTF gives a few guys the sole authority to dictate what goes into a release? They said they would write the code -- that's all they can do. Feel free to link me to something from the signers that suggests otherwise.

Exactly. This assumption that someone else can sign something in my name without my consent is idiotic. The people who were present at that 'argeement' only represented themselves, not other Core contributors, not Core, not my cat, no one else besides themselves.

Quote from: exstasie on May 27, 2016, 08:06:57 AM

I disagree. Fuck this deal, and fuck Antpool. He can go ahead and block Segwit implementation all he wants -- it's only big blockers that are crying for a capacity increase, anyway. And in that case, no one can blame Core for "stagnating development" given how many doors Segwit opens for scalability, privacy and new features.

Exactly. Some question how long it would take for Segwit to be adopted and actually bringing the 'capacity' increase. I find it very simple: If you want the capacity increase, you adopt it. Else you don't want the capacity increase. Classic supporters have tried just about any nonsense argument against it.

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 27, 2016, 10:31:06 AM

i'm right here with carlton ... waiting to fire up my blockstream hub you drooling idiot.

Greetings from the PR department (according to Franky). Roll Eyes

Damn, you guys are slow.

The HK meeting happened. The way Core deals with it will influence the success of Segwit and maybe even Core itself. Why is this so difficult to understand?

Thus far it has removed the "threat" of Classic taking over. Surely this has benefited Core and those who prefer their take on things?

Core has been served a solution on a silver platter. To push that away now would be unwise.

Core needs to continuously make sure that vital parts of the ecosystem are assured that their business models won't be harmed simply due to intransigence.

If you really think Bitcoin is just another open source project, then you're more naive than I thought.