Quote from: Pencila on May 28, 2016, 12:50:13 PM

Quote from: Eliovp on May 28, 2016, 12:39:54 PM

Hey guys, just got back from holiday.

My apologies for not being able to reply to all messages.

Quote from: citronick on May 28, 2016, 10:25:06 AM

Quote from: Nabicoma on May 28, 2016, 10:20:57 AM

Quote from: citronick on May 28, 2016, 06:28:20 AM

Quote from: philipma1957 on May 27, 2016, 05:44:52 PM

Quote from: WotanWipeout on May 27, 2016, 04:49:56 PM

Claymores Dual Miner.

Thanks I will check it out.

CDM mines ETH and DCR together.

I use the ETH only mode, and CDM can push the 390 to near 30MHs.

I used qtminer before this because of the Stratum mode, now it's all CDM for my 390 rigs (149.5MHs@5x390@1290w-1350w@-100mV/1028Mhz/1500Mhz). Quite slick this miner, and its has many bells and whistles like failover, monitoring, solo-mode w/o proxy and it's Stratum compliant too.

I will be attempting Eliovp's Nano mod for my first Nano rig (I am still trying to get an afternoon off to do this). And combined with CDM, I think we have a winner for the highest hash at lowest possible wattage, amps for ETH mining.

Have you tried to mine with 1200 memory frequency. For my XFX 390 cards, there is no difference between 1200 and 1500MHz with 1050 Core.

WI'll try it out. My 390 is MSI so I think no issues in underclocking the memory mhz.

When mining Eth, you can easily down clock that mem to 1125. Works perfectly

And if you can, undervolt AUX (Voltage given to the memory controller), it won't make such a huge impact, but every bit counts

Greetings!

When you reduce the memory frequency from 1500 to 1200 MHz, it will save 20% of energy consumed by the memory.

Mmm, not so sure about that though :p

What is true, is that 20% of 1500 = 300, in other words, 1500 - 300 = 1200. So you reduce your memory by 20%, not the energy consumed Wink