Quote from: rtrtcrypto on May 30, 2016, 01:27:21 PM

Further, and once more, there is also a glaring contradiction in saying IOTA is only software for IOT and then asking to be paid in it and ONLY it.

That's when the genius business plan of masking a coin sale by calling it "software" start to create nothing but problems. The fraudsters are trying really-really hard to mask the scam by calling the coin a "software". At the same time they organize the exchange presence for the "software", barking on that the "software" has created more presale ROI than any coins so far ... and of course asking the "donation" to be made in IOTA coin (i.e. software). So now they are asking 5% of IOTA token (i.e. software) to be donated back. WTF? When they need money the software is suddenly a coin, which 5% will be taken back by the scammers.

Now the scammers, their shills and sockpuppets blackmail the "investors" who bought into the scam that they will be leaving, because the development cost money. No shit .. the development cost money. When the $500K was collected and the P&D (i.e. product) was promised it was clear as well that software development cost money.

So now David boy says, donate me back 5% of your IOTA token (i.e. software) what I sold you, because software development cost money. Hilarious. It's like Bill Gates would blackmail the MSFT shareholders that sorry, I have just realized software development cost money, so donate me back a piece (5%) of your fucking Windows 95 CD - what I sold you - otherwise I deliver nothing.