Quote from: iotatoken on May 31, 2016, 08:03:33 PM

Quote from: Netzer on May 31, 2016, 07:20:27 PM

Quote from: iotatoken on May 31, 2016, 07:03:05 PM

Quote from: Netzer on May 31, 2016, 06:57:15 PM

sorry to hear there is no room for collaboration with GDc. I invested in both IOTA and GDC. can't be the bottlenecks removed? sometimes the parties must compromise to make business together.

The bottlenecks were purely personal, nothing on a technical level. The leader of the project wanted all communication to happen through him. I.E. no discussion with the GDC community or developers, which means no fluidity or organic collaboration, on both sides we're dependent on this single individual being available at all times across all timezones 24/7 365, which of course is impossible. This also meant no stimulating discussions with developers etc. In addition to this - quite ironically given him being the bottleneck - if you did not respond within a couple of hours he would block you out of nowhere. Let's just say that I have very little reason to believe this will change and thus it is borderline impossible to collaborate with their project.

ok, thanks! I will ask the GDC devs if they can adopt to a different communication. would you accept if 2-3 people talking from GDC not only one? Would be rationality or gain for IOTA in a collaboration? if you think yes, IOTA is interested, I can ask the GDC developers to delegate a team not only one person.

To be honest I don't see anything they can really do for us at this point, they'd have to come up with a compelling reason for us to spend time on it and the 'rules of engagement' would have to be sane. It's really at the bottom of the bottom of our priority list at the moment.

oops, I've already sent a message to the GDC dev to contact you. i will undo it and tell them don't make any contact. Cheesy

Either way is good. good enough for me if IOTA is busy and doing well. thanks!