Quote from: gmaxwell on June 06, 2016, 05:32:19 AM

CT isn't part of Bitcoin Core's roadmap at this time; but somehow its not shocking that you're vigorously opposed to it for unexplained reasons. There are like a bazillion people on /r/btc who would love to hear your theories that Bitcoin Core is bad because the blocks will be _bigger_ under it's plans though, I suggest you go share your theories there.

so no actual numbers then?
so blockstream paid coders are now backing out of CT
well we already seen the hardfork was proposed for 2017.. which you and luke JR are now pretending was also not part of the roadmap.

i wonder what else is going to be backed out of and pretend it was never a part of the roadmap.

im guessing you actually did do the maths and realised the initial roadmap which meant to be completed in 2017 had a bloat of over 5mb.. and now your back tracking and trying to bring it down to a conservative 3.6mb.. oops sorry i forgot backtracking no longer includes the 2mb hard fork.. so a conservative 1.8mb real data bloat without the hardfork included.