Quote from: placebo on June 06, 2016, 07:45:48 AM

Quote from: JollyTrades on June 06, 2016, 07:41:54 AM

Quote from: placebo on June 06, 2016, 07:40:04 AM

Quote from: traumschiff on June 06, 2016, 07:37:47 AM

I'm keeping the WAVES sig btw, not interested in getting free RISE and not investing into that project. WAVES (just as ETH did) will offer something unique and needed in a decentralized fashion (unlike Ripple).

RISE is just riding the DAPPS hype with a LISK clone and Alty as a project manager. I would advise caution.

But Waves also just a CLONE.... I mean if you are talking about unique then Waves doesn't apply here. This is not code that was written from 0%. RISE can maybe be a ride of from LISK, and there will some coins following for sure, but if every clone of LISK will give only half of the profit then what LISK is giving then i'll be in all of those clones Cheesy

I bet you either don't know what "clone" means, or are here just to be annoying.

The point is everything is a clone from something, and there is nothing wrong with it at all. Why do you want to invent the wheel again when it already exist? The coin is only as successful as the people that are managing the coin, all the rest is copy and paste.

You clearly don't understand, RISE is trying to ride the hype of a project that just launched WEEKS AGO. How is that reinventing? Reinventing an alpha/beta project that has still tons of space to grow and can take on different directions? I don't see how this is useful.

This is how WAVES differs highly and why I named ETH aswell.

Also as people pointed out above, WAVES is not a clone of anything. It's written in the Scorex framework.