Quote from: franky1 on June 08, 2016, 08:38:49 PM

Quote from: rizzlarolla on June 08, 2016, 08:07:17 PM

Quote from: rizzlarolla on June 06, 2016, 09:47:31 PM

I have asked Greg if he knows the average transaction size as that figure would indeed be more relevant here.

Sorry guys, Greg not interested.

Quote from: rizzlarolla on June 06, 2016, 03:21:19 PM

Just waffle these days.

easy maths
average blocksize
https://blockchain.info/charts/avg-block-size?timespan=30days

divided by average transactions per block
https://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions-per-block?timespan=30days

10th may: 721,200byte / 1543tx = 467byte/tx
11th may: 772,400byte / 1725tx = 447byte/tx
12th may: 792,500byte / 1642tx = 482byte/tx

then ill skip a few to highlight the high of that data
19th may: 951,900byte / 1728tx = 550byte/tx

and the low of that data
23rd may: 587,600byte / 1095tx = 536byte/tx

on a previous post i also done some maths on 10 blocks based purely on the time of posting.. rather than the generalised numbers of blockstreams daily stats

nowhere was i seeing any pattern that related to 226-250 transaction averages.
and no where in the reality of real people making real transactions does 226-250 have any big correlation

I think your right.

But when you tell us Greg laugh's. Then Icebreaker mock's. Carlton mock's and finally Lauda mock's.
I wanted Greg to answer, as he was bothered to laugh at you.