Quote from: BunkerChain.Labs.Inc. on June 09, 2016, 04:40:04 AM

Quote from: Relaxedsense on June 09, 2016, 01:50:04 AM

Quote from: Tusho on June 09, 2016, 12:00:49 AM

I am thinking of investing myself. What I find a bit off-putting is the website itself. It looks amateur, if you open your console you see many errors, not even a favicon. Not saying the people invested are incapable but online gambling is very much about how smooth, good etc a platform looks.

I played online blackjack and mostly poker and I remember that the platform was the most important for me. Now, a tech start-up should have a solid online representation and Peerplays doesn't. Any thoughts on why or counter arguments that convince me to invest?

Interesting remarks you made. I have invested myself purely based on the team and concept. I have to agree with your opinion about the website. Devs, care to shed a light upon this?

A few days ago Ed made an update to the site to include all the mega press we are getting.

It looks like during the merge with git a directory containing some of the .js library was not included.

It was around 4am in the UK at the time so I just manually added the library until Ed can get sorted with git. It was just a missing directory of .js files that didn't appear to have any noticeable impact on the site, so it went largely unnoticed the last few days.

Thanks for bringing it up so I could fix it in the mean time!

Thank you, that makes sense! The team and the concept is more important to me but the website still plays one of many roles in the decision making process. I had made up my mind anyways and am on board as I love the idea.

The idea behind Peerplays is something that WILL HAPPEN. Just about who makes it happen and if you guys do it well, this could be amazing.