Quote from: Jocuserious on June 09, 2016, 02:03:13 AM

Quote from: Tusho on June 09, 2016, 12:00:49 AM

I am thinking of investing myself. What I find a bit off-putting is the website itself. It looks amateur, if you open your console you see many errors, not even a favicon. Not saying the people invested are incapable but online gambling is very much about how smooth, good etc a platform looks.

I played online blackjack and mostly poker and I remember that the platform was the most important for me. Now, a tech start-up should have a solid online representation and Peerplays doesn't. Any thoughts on why or counter arguments that convince me to invest?

I am unsure that the omission of a favicon would be considered an error. You say, "many errors," may I ask what you are seeing? I see a website that is more or less typical of many crypto projects these days. I attributed the look to being more of a style than an indicator of technical competence.

It's far from alarming.

The Favicon is just a small attention to detail and not that important. The errors I referred to were addressed in the post below yours, so all good. "Failed to load resource: net::ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT" etc etc... Makes sense to have it more as a source of information than as an indicator of technical competence. Just for a gambling platform (on top of the technical realisation) a UI is very important. Hope they put the energy they saved on the peerplays website into the end product and I'm all happy!