Quote from: QuintLeo on June 09, 2016, 07:53:40 AM

Quote from: jimlite on June 09, 2016, 03:30:34 AM

Quote from: RastoMan on June 08, 2016, 11:38:18 AM

Quote from: giagge on June 08, 2016, 08:14:27 AM

Quote from: vaulter on June 07, 2016, 06:55:37 PM

Quote from: Amph on June 07, 2016, 05:53:05 PM

Quote from: vaulter on June 07, 2016, 05:42:55 PM

Quote from: giagge on June 07, 2016, 05:20:01 PM

1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .

Read up - 27mhs at 100w
Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week...

that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7?

Linux and Win 10
Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that..

Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks!

And Gtx 1080 ? .

The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining.

You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues.

The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27).

There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU.

Fury-x can do around 32mh/s on ethereum + 1700mh/s on decred simultaneaously with claymore dual miner. Nano just a little bit less (for nano http://mininghwcomparison.com/list/index.php?brand=amd)