Quote from: bryant.coleman on June 11, 2016, 08:42:40 PM

Quote from: Masha Sha on June 11, 2016, 05:35:29 PM

Quote from: bryant.coleman on June 11, 2016, 05:28:35 PM

Quote from: Dan Yur on June 11, 2016, 05:16:59 PM

If the anglo-saxons in the future do not want to make of their island a new Atlantis, it is best to get out of NATO

The NATO should have been disbanded after the disintegration of the USSR, and the collapse of the Warsaw Pact. Right now, NATO is playing world police by invading countless third world nations, causing the death and displacement of millions of civilians. NATO member nations have become some of the worst perpetrators of human rights abuses (Turkey for example).

Supporting the bashar and his Iranians friends will always take the lead. Third world countries must be invaded and occupied because they fuck like rabbits and otherwise will invade the west and ultimately Russia. The west and Russia are in the same boat and are both exploited by third worlders to gain military tech...

I don't get your point. It is true that some of the Muslim countries discourage family planning. But toppling Bashar al Assad and replacing him with Al Nusra / ISIS is not the solution. Assad is secular, while the opposition is hardcore Islamist. The situation will worsen under their rule, and millions of Syrians will flee to the European Union and the other western nations if they come to power.

The thing is, many choices in the Middle East are between an authoritarian or theological regime. If you want to keep extremism at bay, then is most cases you have to install a dictator. If you let the people choose, they often choose a religious government that threatens western interests. We're stuck between a rock and a hard place