Quote from: Fuserleer on June 14, 2016, 12:12:39 AM

Quote from: cryptohunter on June 14, 2016, 12:09:04 AM

Quote from: Fuserleer on June 14, 2016, 12:03:19 AM

Block chains can't scale without centralization...period. Side chains are nasty hacks that add more problems than they solve, as is the lightning network, segwit and all the other "work arounds". Anyone that says otherwise is arguing against CAP theorem which is an effect of the speed of light limit.

This is a debate I've had many times and I spent a long time looking for solutions back in 2012-2013 before realizing the obvious.

A block chain is "a single threaded process", if you want more performance/scalability the only thing you can do is add more processing power per node, which raises the barrier to entry and reduces the number of nodes doing the actual processing (centralization).

The only way to increase scalability to 10,000 tps and beyond and maintain decentralization is to add parallelism to the processing of transactions, and drop the block chain based ledger structure. We're the only project that does that and has it functional today.

Eth is also looking at something similar, but they are 2+ years away from it as of today and it has limitations due to it being block chain based shards.

I keep saving my btc for this....but it is taking a long time to release. When can I get some emunie ??

Why is cancer taking so long for a cure?

Same question, same answer. It's hard work on a difficult problem and takes time to solve.

If it was easy, there would already be a cure for cancer (lets leave the conspiracies at the door) and a scalable, efficient, stable crypto platform

Okay, I hear you