Quote from: designerusa on June 17, 2016, 10:01:15 AM

Quote from: AscendancyEight on June 14, 2016, 02:20:53 AM

Seems perfectly reasonable to me. Public property shouldn't be displaying oversexualized and unrealistic body images, it hurts self esteem and promotes a "bikini body" culture that harms those who don't have perfect bodies (fat shaming). And even then, this is a response to massive popular backlash; I don't really see why it's a concern?

it is pretty obvious that this act is very logical for me too because few people have got a body like a super model. people dont have to have skinny legs, tiny belly etc. as society , we want to see normal people in advertisments for sure. there is no wrong thing with this decision..

No WE don't want to see advertisement, what ever fatty or skinny! WE don't want to have OUR precious brain cycle parasited by stupid ads influencing OUR emotions and OUR MOOD.

WE the people want ads free public space! WE the people don't want OUR children influenced by others.

WE see that some people only write using WE, WE believe that they have been contaminated by the WEit.

WE understand the WEit as a form of mental illness linked to overexposure to ads creating a false sense of WEism.

WE are afraid of the WEists.

OUR gov must save US.

Time to declare the war on ads and WEism.

WE the Ipeople!