Quote from: iamnotback on June 19, 2016, 02:35:33 PM

Quote from: MySecondCunt on June 19, 2016, 02:29:14 PM

In other words, I have no idea what sort of people Vitalik hangs with, so talking shit on the interweb prob'ly ain't the smartest thing ever.

...

This could be his downfall if Ethereum sides with "law" and lure him into violating some US law. The SEC is probably still waiting to entrap him.

But I don't like where Vitalik is headed with this blacklisting shit! Sad

As many of us opined before the failure, The DAO was going to lead to more regulation of CC.

Quote from: iamnotback on June 19, 2016, 03:18:51 PM

Vitalik et al creating an obvious clusterfuck that results in blacklisting thus handing the State the power to implement KYC blocking in the future, just smacks of premeditated.

Quote from: iamnotback on June 19, 2016, 03:25:40 PM

Quote from: GreenBits on June 19, 2016, 03:23:54 PM

The legalness of the "attack" got murky when the "attacker" put in the order for the eth short. Curious to see if using that information, or dissemination of it to others, constitutes insider trading.

The vulnerability was open sourced before he did it thus apparently no insider information was used! Even the developers of DAO had a patch but didn't push through with it.

It is so unbelieveable, but I can't make this stuff up.