Quote from: MySecondCunt on June 19, 2016, 03:35:59 PM

Quote from: iamnotback on June 19, 2016, 03:18:51 PM

Reasonable point, but I say we have sufficient evidence that the State is out to get us. 6000 years of it.

We are here to dismantle the multi-nationals and create a decentralized individually empowered world. That is our goal!

We want to explore the limits of what the computer and Internet revolution can disrupt.

Revelation # 1:1-7 KJV
While "dismantling" is very Nietzschean, edgy, and D-rock,
1a. make double-sure that we have only to kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will come crashing down. Because that played out badly in the past.
1b. make double-sure that you know how to build, not just disrupt.
1c. make double-sure that what comes next is not substantially worse than the shit you disrupted. I, for one, do not welcome our new Romanian overloads.

Revelation # 2:1-3, KJV
Surprise! Funny looking Russo-Canadian kid is not the state.
None of the altcoins are. Most of them share your ideals, regardless of how misguided, self-contradictory, and downright childish those may be. Make friends with the alts. Make love, not war!
Eww eww ewwww!!!11!1!1!1!

The Fractal Pattern of nature.

Quote of myself first:

Quote from: http://unheresy.com/The%20Universe.html#Matter_as_a_continuum

Matter as a continuum

A function of time is equivalently a function of frequency.

Presented perhaps for the first time is a novel insight to understanding the Holographic principle that since a function can't be both time-limited and band-limited, the configuration of space over any finite interval (i.e. locality) of time is not independent of the infinite past and future. Matter must be an infinite continuum of configurations oscillating as waves. The frequency domain has two dimensions, phase (not shown above) and amplitude; thus only two functions of frequency are necessary to represent the 4D spacetime 2D × 2 = 4D. This can be visualized in 3D as the consistent time which corresponds to the phases in the frequency domain of two functions, with the two independent amplitudes providing the altitude and azimuth degrees-of-freedom for the direction of movement of the configuration.

Holography inspires this amplitude and phase interpretation because it records three dimensions of information of the speckle pattern, stored in the opacity of a 2D surface, due to interference (on recording and defraction on viewing) of a coherent phase and monochromatic reference beam with the decoherent environmental light field.

The non-uniform distribution of mass is mutually causal with oscillation. A uniform distribution of mass would be no contrast and nothing could exist, especially knowledge creation.

Matter's canonical definition is circular because it doesn't state what it is. The answer to what is the universe made of? has been whatever it is, it must have the attributes of the mass and volume things we make from it. This definition is disunified because it excludes light and wave effects that don't have volume. But if spacetime emerges from two dimensions of the frequency domain continuum, then volume and mass are also just effects which emerge from the same fundamental matter as light. Since the long sought Holy Grail of science has been to unify quantum mechanics and relativity, it would be logical to define matter to be the thing that everything else in the universe is derived from. Future work is to analyze the relationship of this postulate to existing interpretations of quantum mechanics.

Martin Armstrong:

Quote from: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/trading-close-v-intraday/

<--- Look at this hidden fractal order!

Quote from: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/models/model-overview/

Everything within the universe is FRACTAL and predicated upon a system of self-referral. Your children are biologically constructed from the merger of you and your spouses DNA, and thus, they are a product of self-referral where they have traits and appearances based upon their parents and their future medical prospects are based upon what they inherited.

Quote from: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/time-the-fourth-dimension/

The second question is How does Time move? Does it flow like light and sound in waves? Or does it move in a straight line? Can we experience time flow? Or can we only measure the flow of TIME? These were questions we have tackled in our models.

Quote from: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/models/the-end-of-time/

This fractal structure of time and history appeared to build in groups of six and thus 8.6 x 6 = 51.6 years, six of these waves formed a wave structure of 309.6 years. While it was clear that six of these waves established primary chunks of time defined as 1857.6 years, such a time scale appeared vast in terms of human social-economic history, but it was still just a pimple on a flys ass as they say in terms of earths history and the course of nature. Six waves at this level produced 11,145.6 years that seems to have defined civilization itself as the earliest known mud bricks are invented to build houses in Mesopotamia about 8500BC and pottery seems to appear 10,000-9000BC.

Quote from: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/research/economic-thought/by-topic/chaos-theory/

This fascinating dimension was summarised by Edward Lorenz as follows:

Quote

Chaos: When the present determines the future, but the approximate present does not approximately determine the future.

This extraordinary complexity of that created the surface impression of chaos, hides amazing order hidden below. This Chaotic Behavior can be observed in many natural systems, from such things as weather to economics. Our problem has been mankinds attempt to reduce everything he sees to simple minded one-dimensional cause and effect. This type of explanation of such behavior has restrained our ability to move forward in many fields, the least of which is not social-science that includes economics.

Deterministic Chaos may be the key to everything for within both nature and our social world, we are surrounded with complexity yet we try to rationalize everything to a single dimension unable to cope with the dynamics of the world in which we live.