Quote from: RastoMan on June 20, 2016, 09:50:25 AM

Quote from: iamnotback on June 19, 2016, 03:14:23 PM

Quote from: glerand on June 19, 2016, 03:02:59 PM

Quote from: x13 on June 19, 2016, 03:00:04 PM

No, I do not agree! The open letter of the attackers states what the truth is. I rightly created a child dao and used it to recursively get Ether. This is acutally not forbidden it is just a bug in a feature in a decentralized environment.

If you are near an ATTM, the ATM malfunctioned, it spit out cash. If you take the cash and did not give it back, it is criminal action.

The problem here is who decides what the "intent" of the contract was?

The miners will decide what the "intent" of the contract was? There is a voting going on in several mining pools.

I think the "hacker" or the DAO holders are trying their best to persuade the miners to work in their favour.