Quote from: gmaxwell on June 25, 2016, 07:25:44 AM

Quote from: Adrian-x on June 24, 2016, 10:50:53 PM

among them the implementation of bitcoin's a scripting language on which LN will be dependant.

What are you talking about?

This didn't make sense to me either. I wonder where he got this from? I guess it is only a matter of time before Classic supporters start running around and screaming 'LN is Bitcoin's DAO' (since they're doing the same for Segwit). As for anyone who is reading: This is how you internally cause damage to open-source projects. Complaining and spreading FUD about current and future developments and not contributing a single bit.

Quote from: gmaxwell on June 25, 2016, 07:25:44 AM

You do? Oh. So perhaps you can tell me who is funding classic developers Zander and Gavin?

In the eyes of the "anti-Core" 'group', as long as they're not part of Blockstream they are fine. Roll Eyes

Quote from: gmaxwell on June 25, 2016, 07:31:31 AM

Predictably dishonest people are predictable dishonest.

This version numbering is truly dishonest.

Quote from: renem on June 25, 2016, 07:52:06 AM

Voluntary and decentralized non geographically bound governance

Exactly. Decentralization, censorship resistance, immutability and such are the values that need to be kept in place.

Quote from: DeathAngel on June 25, 2016, 01:39:56 PM

Why does this thread still even exist? Grin

I assume to spread the word of their misdoings and correct false information.