Quote from: ziiip on June 26, 2016, 09:31:43 PM

Quote from: Carlton Banks on June 26, 2016, 09:26:47 PM

Quote from: ziiip on June 26, 2016, 09:16:28 PM

I don't think a winged pegasus would be nessisary but the following item should suffice. $549
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Supermicro-2U-Server-H8DG6-F-2x-AMD-6272-2-1ghz-16-Core-128gb-9211-8i-6g-1x1200w-/371646283884?hash=item5687d8406c:g:h3UAAOSwbYZXUfpX

Dollars? eBay? What sort of Bitcoiner is this? Oh right, the sort that wants to start the 1,0001st failed attempt at a hard fork dev team coup

Can you not engage in a meaningful debate?

Listen, we get shilled and trolled to high heaven on this forum by people sugesting exactly your forthright assertion that blocksize needs increasing via hardfork. If you're onboard with Segwit, coming in with suggestions to cut off >half the hashrate is really disruptive, if nothing else, particularly seeing as Segwit is a blocksize increase.

Quote from: Lauda

Segwit is implemented and has been recently merged for the upcoming version... However, the exact details of activation have not been set yet.

It might come out earlier, in 0.12.2. Depends how they schedule it all. Activation is the same/similar to the other soft forks: 95% of blocks in a 2016 block window locks the activation date to another 2016 blocks after that.