I would just like to say the following:
I know a few people that are the whales in this coin (they own quite a bit over 10%+ of the coin supply). Since I am involved in a few other business deals with them, it indirectly affects my business if GBT does poorly (as they lose value on their investment). Because of this, I made the following offer to the GBT Dev team (which was rejected):
1. The MoneyPot team takes over development/hosting/marketing for Gamebet. This would be a boon for Gamebet, as MoneyPot already has over 20k registered users. MoneyPot would not only honor the obligation to all token holders, but increase profit share for token holders from 10%, to 25%.
2. Current development team gets to keep 70BTC from the dev fund. The remaining dev fund+GBT supply held by the dev team is handed over to MoneyPot to finance the continuation of this project.
Best of luck to holders of this token.
So all this time that you were spreading FUD, your plan was a hostile takeover?
Not quite. I never spread FUD, I said this was a bad investment. The risk vs reward was ridiculous ($1MM valuation for no traction). I am working with IOTUSA on another project at the moment, and I am offering this as a way to save the project (and try and keep his capital intact). If his investment does well, it means he is in a better position --> my other project with him as a higher chance of success.
But yes, you can call this a hostile takeover. I offered the deal privately and it was rejected, which is why I am taking it public now.
email or message here if the Skype conversation happens. I'm making dinner.