In the OP you admit that no one has been able to solve the ideals you claim as being ideal.
Then, you go on to crucify any cryptocurrency that doesn't meet these unobtainable ideals by trolling Bitcointalk.
I didn't crucify any project. I wrote these are my ideals, i.e. goals.
I did point out where existing projects don't yet accomplish these idealistic goals, which just makes facts, not crucifixion. If nothing yet meets my ideal goals, that doesn't mean I am crucifying the others.
Since no one is willing to waste as much time as you are by defending their points, you "win" by default.
Outlining idealistic goals and shooting to achieve them, is a win for everyone that cares and shares my vision about the value and idealistic outlook for our crypto block chain ecosystem.
Perhaps you didn't realize this thread isn't pumping any projects. Just because I didn't pump your favorite investments, doesn't mean you didn't win. Unless you are just a selfish Hitler "assimilate or die" retard. I already know from your prior stalking of me, that you are 20-something guy at the university with a chip on your shoulder. Hopefully you come to maturity senses after reading this, and chillax. But something tells me your bruised tardbutt ego is going to go ballistic instead of taking this mild "for you own good' educational spanking and realize you are just acting like a jealous asshat again.
Since your ideal list of cryptocurrency "must haves" is not achievable, ...
I will later prove it is achievable; thus your assumption is incorrect.
But even presuming you are correct (which you aren't), it is still okay for some of us to have idealistic R&D goals.
...it is akin to me saying "all cryptocurrencies should solve world hunger" or "all cryptocurrencies should have the ability to time travel".
I did not state any where in this thread that anyone should stop their involvement in existing projects in the interim time until my goals are attained. Nor did I state they should abandon other projects and choose my idealism if ever my ideal goals were attained. Every person should decide for themself.
Then, imagine that I go around trolling all cryptocurrencies that do not have these features.
You used to troll other coins while trying to promote the features of Bitshares.
And I didn't troll any CCs in this thread. You are trolling my thread and attacking me. So don't be surprised by my reaction. Grow up kid.
That is in essence what you have been doing for the past year(s) on here.
Do you have my photo taped on your dorm room door and throw darts at it while studying?
Chillax bro and focus on making your own accomplishments. Stop stalking my coattails, because you are jealous when I have any readership. Otherwise you just waste time & effort you could apply to making your own accomplishments.
(I'd refer you to threads over the past month where I did extensive mea culpas about being wrong for harping about scams and taking strong-willed sides about which projects are worthy, but I don't think you are sincerely interested in the power of reformation and improvement)
There is no such thing as a fair cryptocurrency distribution.
What is fair to someone (for example, you) would not be considered fair by someone else (enter some random person here).
The definition I am using was provided upthread. What you've written is not my definition. You are free to not ascribe to my definition of a fair, free market, competitively priced launch distribution. And others are free to ascribe to my ideals.
You may think you have obtained some state of enlightenment, and been able to solve the problem no one has been able to solve, but you are fooling yourself.
I cannot wait for you to release your plans for an "ideal" distribution so that I can point out all of the ways it will be considered unfair by random current and future participants.
You are so sure of yourself. Cocky enough to troll your
off-topic attacks. Remember how when we were teenagers and we thought our parents were stupid. And you are a 20-something "know it all" now disrespecting a 51-year computer programmer with 37 years of coding experience. It doesn't mean a 20 year old doesn't have anything useful to say. Rather it means don't go gun blazing,
when you are not even not wrong, but rather off-topic. If you want to start a "I hate AnonyMint" thread, then go ahead. There is actually already
such a thread about AnonyMint that got move to Reputation. Your personal attacks on me are off-topic to this thread subject.
I am going to ask you one time nicely to please not troll this thread with nonsense bickering, back and forth flame wars.